Holger Floeting
|
In my lecture I'd like to focus on the relationship between the so-called "new media" and urban development. What is meant by "new media"? "New media" is a term which has been used in German urban research since the mid 1980s. At that time "new media" meant interactive videotext, or "Bildschirmtext" (Engl: screen text) as it was called in Germany, where the monopoly telecom carrier "Deutsche Bundespost" introduced this technology in the early 1980s. "Bildschirmtext" was a barely developed technology for transmitting written messages via telephone. The appearance of these early "Webpages" was similar to an ASCI code document. If one wished to add graphic elements to the document one had only to construct it from individual characters. Nevertheless, "Bildschirmtext" was a kind of forerunner to the world wide web - even if these are totally different technologies. But it was national - not world-wide, i.e. in France and Britain there was much the same service, but using different technologies, so that there was no chance of exchanging messages between addressees in different European countries (sounds a bit like European railway). And "Bildschirmtext" was not user friendly - the French Minitel (the French version of "Bildschirmtext") was much simpler to use. This was the West-German story. The East-German story was completely different. In the 1980s East-Germans did not have to be concerned about "Bildschirmtext", because most of the population did not even own a telephone. Telephone lines were rare possessions in East-Germany. That applied to cable TV as well. Most of the East-Germans had no cable TV, when it was the usual medium in West-German urban areas to receive broadcasts. Figure 1 In the 1990s the technological drivers were cellular phones, Internet based services like world wide web or e-mail and satellite TV, technologies which globalize, de-spatialize, mobilize and re-arrange spatial patterns of use at the same time. Why should we be concerned about information and communication technologies? There are four simple reasons:
Why do urban areas have to deal with ICT? ICT is used to distribute codified knowledge. Urban areas are centres of knowledge. That is the reason why urban centres are most affected by the use of ICT. They are also hubs of the new information infrastructures like cellular phone or high-band width fixed networks. Competition between several telecom carriers or internet providers occurs frequently in urban areas. ICT users are concentrated in these areas. Knowledge based industries are concentrated in urban areas. Here you can find innovative settings for developing new ICT services as well as the contents to transmit by using ICT. Decision makers in economics and politics are located primarily in urban areas. They use ICT themselves, but they also have to decide on the framework conditions of technology development. Therefore urban areas are locations of industrial-political decisions which define the technological future. What is the current stage of ICT development in Germany? I will focus on internet development as one of the core technologies which determines the ICT future. In 1997, only 6.5 percent of the German population aged 14 or older, used the internet. Within only 4 years this percentage increased to 38.8 percent. But although we had to face a dramatic rise in internet use, nearly two thirds of the population are not yet online. Figure 2 Figure 3 In 1997, the Internet was the media for the computer generation. Two thirds of the Internet users in Germany are aged 20 to 39 years. In 2002, this age bracket accounts for only half of the Internet users whereas 35 percent of Germans on the Internet are 40 years or older. Five percent are 60 years old or older. In 1997 this age class accounted for only 1 percent. What this means is that the Internet is a common tool for many levels of the population. Looking at the educational level of Internet users shows us a more balanced distribution of Internet use. In the 1990s the Internet was only used by people with higher educational levels. In 2001 people with an "Abitur" or a diploma amounted 46 percent of the Internet users which was a fairly high rate. But in 1997 it was already 62 percent. Internet is a tool in the daily life of people at nearly all educational levels. Nevertheless "nonliners" remain, people who cannot afford or manage to use this new universal information and communication tool, or people who simply do not enjoy using it. Figure 4 In 1997 the Internet was a media mostly used by men. In Germany 73 percent of the Internet users were men. Even if male users are still the majority, 43 percent of Internet users now are female. This is linked to noticeable impacts on content and the ways in which the Internet is used. Men use the Internet as an electronic toy, whereas the average female user appraises the added value of Internet contents for their daily lives. In the long run this will change Internet contents, even if "male contents" dominate the websites today. Figure 5 Figure 6 In the 1990s the Internet began as a tool used at work. Only 27 percent of the users had an Internet access at home. About 60 percent used the Internet in the office. In 2002, 50 percent of the "onliners" are on the Internet at home and 34 percent can use it at home or in the office. Internet turned from a working tool into a tool used in daily life. The integration into everyday life is also proven by the increased time people spend on the Internet. In 1997 people were using the Internet on an average of 71 minutes each weekday. In 2002 the average is 112 minutes. Figure 7 What do people do on the Internet? They search for national and international information as well as for notes on regional event. They use it for "serious" economic information as well as entertainment. The Internet develops a new continuum of information: it intermingles global and local focuses with new "glocalities" and blends information with entertainment to create "infotainment" and it mixes educational subjects with entertainment to create "edutainment", and so forth. Figure 8 Figure 9 Can we simply prolong the curves of former development to see the future of information society? A brief look into the past shows that forecasts run the risk of being mistaken. Especially in the technological sector. Merely look at the example of Ken Olson who thought that there was no reason to have a computer. That was in 1977. And he was later the founder of "Digital Equipment". He should have known better. Another example thought that the Internet was just hype. The man supposing that was Bill Gates in 1995. Even if we go back to the example of the German "Bildschirmtext" mentioned earlier, comparing the forecasts of number of users with the real number shows that the forecasters were too optimistic - in fact nearly ten times too optimistic. Various future trends concerning ICT and urban development are being discussed at present:
Figure 10 There is not merely a single future of the urban system, but possibly multiple futures, depending on technological progress and social and economic development. How will these futures look? A hierarchical push of national and international systems in urban areas is one of the possible futures. Since the 1980s we have seen the rise of a new class of urban centres: global cities that depend more on international economic development than on local and national framework conditions. Another process identified is the increasing competition between urban areas for investors and investments, and for gaining job possibilities for their inhabitants, and for receiving attention in general. What the German sociologists Häußermann and Siebel call the "festivalization" of urban politics is one result of these changes (Häußermann/Siebel 1993). Municipalities try to organise events and mega-events, projects and mega-projects, to call attention to their city or town. Large museums, harbour front developments and festivals are examples of these municipal efforts. Disparities between directing regions - such as corporate headquarter locations - and dependent regions - such as industrial locations - may increase. An ever greater number of headquarters may concentrate in fewer and fewer cities and towns leading to a loss of importance in other regions. Deconcentration processes, which would give rural areas greater importance could occur, but a reversal of current trends in less favoured regions, depending solely on technological progress, is not expected. Figure 11 A theoretical model of the spatial consequences of ICT development has been under discussion since the 1980s (Floeting/Grabow 1998, 23):
How do municipal authorities in Germany assess their activities in promoting ICT on a local level and in creating an information society? Difu has conducted several written surveys on this subject. The figure below shows the results of the 1997 and the 2000 surveys on municipal ICT activities. We asked ICT experts in municipal administrations how they would describe the municipal activities. German municipalities assume that they conduct various activities. They assess their activities as, in general, advanced, proactive and coordinated. There is practically no change between their assessments in 1997 and in 2000. Only in the direction of their activities has a change occured. They are now more extroverted. These assessments strengthen the picture of a strongly planned, strategically oriented set of municipal activities. In fact many towns and cities have developed projects to promote ICT. But in general these municipal assessments are overly optimistic. Figure 12 How can the change in urban areas, which is linked to the information society, be described? Visible impacts of technological-economic structural changes can be recognized in several fields of urban development. I would like to mention only a few examples:
Figure 13
Figure 14 So many good practices - what is missing? While developing a variety of urban concepts, municipalities should be aware that ICT is very important for urban development. But cities should concentrate on integrating technological aspects into their existing concepts rather than focus only on the technology itself. Mission statements for building attractive cities with social and cultural cohesion should consider that ICT might be helpful for implementing the concepts, but ICT itself cannot change living conditions fundamentally. These kinds of integrated strategies develop slowly. One example is the "Dortmund-project" which promotes social and economic structural change in a former heavy industry and mining region. This strategy includes:
Part of the strategy is a spatial concept of converted areas in the inner city such as into locations for new industries. Figure 15 Figure 16 What about strategies in other German cities and towns? 91 percent of the large towns with a population of more than 500.000 inhabitants have integrated strategic approaches which include ICT (see figure 17, p. 19). The portion of cities that have integrated strategies drops with lower number in population. In small cities with less than 100.000 inhabitants only 45 percent have developed such strategies. The term "strategy" is fuzzy, i.e. even those cities which have stated that they had an "integrated strategy" sometimes had only a number of activities which they had only declared as "strategic approaches" afterwards. In conclusion I'd like to draw up some "do's" and "don'ts" for planners who are dealing with ICT and the emerging information society. These statements are based on a research project focusing on spatial planning and the emerging ICT in regional Europe which Difu conducted during the past two years in cooperation with research institutions and municipalities in Britain and the Netherlands as part of the Interreg IIC programme of the European Union (SPECTRE 2002, 23-26). Planning processes are affected by structural changes within the information society in four main fields of action:
One of the main difficulties examining the relationship between ICT and urban development is the invisibility of ICT. For the common user, ICT is like electricity - it comes out of the socket but one is not very interested in where it comes from. This applies just as well to the Internet, not to mention cellular telephones. The new interwoven patterns of the material and the virtual have scarcely been "uncovered" up to this point. The "object of investigation" is difficult to discover. Usually we are treating "space as the domain of the dead, the fixed, the undialectic, the immobile - a world of passivity and measurement rather than of action and meaning" (Soja 1989, 37) as Edward Soja stated. But we will have to deal with increasing flexibility in using space, as well as the quickening pace of change in land-use patterns.
|
|
© 1996-2002 Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik, zuletzt geändert am 28.10.2002 Kontakt: webmaster@difu.de - Impressum |