|
||||||||||||||
|
III. |
Approaches to Cooperation Between Frankfurt and its Umland |
|||||||||
|
1. |
Regional planning - the Umlandverband Frankfurt (UVF) Frankfurt Regional Administrative Union |
|||||||||
|
1.1 |
Background From the early seventies, the strong interdependence between Frankfurt and its environs and the growing need for coordination, together with the local authority territorial reorganization envisaged for Hesse (kommunale Gebietsreform), induced individual local politicians and sections of the political parties to table a series of proposals on the administrative restructuring of the Frankfurt region. The debate focused on three approaches: (35)
Finally, the Land government and the Hesse state parliament opted for a mandatory multi-purpose joint authority, which was called into being at the beginning of 1975 by the `Act on the Frankfurt Regional Union' (38) adopted on 11 September 1974. |
|||||||||
|
1.2 |
Functions and Organization of the Umlandverband Frankfurt. The Frankfurt Regional Union covers an area of approximately 1400 kmē, 7 per cent of the territory of Hesse or one quarter of the Rhine-Main area, and with 1.5 million inhabitants, which is 25 per cent of the Hesse population or just under half that of the Rhine-Main area.
The members of the Union are the county boroughs (kreisfreie Städte) of Frankfurt and Offenbach and 41 non-county municipalities and Gemeinden plus `6 Landkreise, of which three belong fully to the Union, while only parts of the others do so'. (39)
The decisive reasons for this territorial extent, which also deviates markedly from the boundaries of the Frankfurt region, excluding important north-eastern sections, were `questions of political expediency rather than regional and Land planning criteria'. (40)
The constitution of the Union is based on the modified Magistrat constitution (unechte Magistratsverfassung) (providing for a collegiate executive) under the Hesse local government (see section I.1) and Landkreis statutes. The institutions provided and the names given them clearly indicate that the legislator had no intention of setting up a traditional joint authority (Zweckverband), but took as a model the organization of local authorities as bodies corporate. Since 1977, the directly elected representative body is the Verbandstag or Union Assembly. It is composed of 105 deputies elected for four years. The number of deputies is proportionate to the distribution of population in the five constituencies. Almost half the deputies accordingly come from Frankfurt and Offenbach.
The administrative authority of the Verband, equivalent to the Magistrat in larger Hesse cities is the Verbandsausschuß or Union Committee. It is elected by the Verbandstag and deals with day-to-day administrative business in conformity with the decisions of the Verbandstag and the Gemeindekammer (Chamber of Local Authorities). The setting up of the third institution, the Gemeindekammer, was necessary for constitutional reasons. Since the Umlandverband is responsible for land-use planning, a function guaranteed to local self-government by the Basic Law, and the Gemeinden were not represented as institutions in the Verbandstag, a body was created in which the municipalities and Gemeinden belonging to the Verband are directly represented - regardless of size - by one representative and one vote each. (41)
According to section 1 of the `Act on the Frankfurt Regional Union', the primary purpose of the UVF is to `promote and secure the orderly development of the Union territory'. A number of functions have been transferred to the Union to achieve this purpose. Primary among these - in keeping with the reasons for setting up the Union - are supralocal planning functions such as establishing land-use plans, general transportation plans, and landscape plans. These so-called `substantial' powers also concern land reserves, water supplies, supralocal water disposal and the operation of waste disposal facilities, abattoirs, and leisure and recreation centres. Besides these substantial powers, the Union has also been assigned a series of cooperative, coordinative, and consultative functions: cooperation in mass transit planning, coordinating energy supply interests, and supralocal functions in environmental protection, locational consulting and publicity in the field of business promotion, and coordinating the interests of communal hospital authorities. (42)
The UVF has no competence in the fields of urban/local development planning and regional planning. Regional planning was initially left in the hands of the Lower Main Standing Conference of Local Planning Authorities (Regionale Planungsgemeinschaft Untermain [RPU]), established for this purpose by the Hesse state government with responsibility for approximately the same area, one of six such bodies in Hesse. With the amendment of the Hesse State Planning Act in 1980, the pertinent powers were transferred to the second tier authority Regierungspräsident (see section I.3). Regardless of this transfer of competence, the regional planning goals relevant for the Frankfurt area have been strongly influenced by the UVF.
The UVF is financed not only by charges (from 1990) and contributions but especially by means of the Union levy (Verbandsumlage) raised from municipalities and Gemeinden belonging to the Union - but not from Kreise. It is set in proportion to both the population and the economic strength of the given Gemeinde. The City of Frankfurt must accordingly contribute almost half of the Union budget - although this does not correspond to its population. (43)
Since the establishment of the Union in 1975, the Union levy has grown steadily. It was initially DM 0.50 per inhabitant, but by 1988 it had already risen to DM 13.85. |
|||||||||
|
2 |
Mass Transit - the Rhein-Main-Verkehrsverbund (RMV) Rhine-Main Integrated Transport System |
|||||||||
|
2.1 |
Background |
|||||||||
|
2.1.1 |
The predecessor FVV (Frankfurter Verkehrs- und Tarifverbund) Frankfurt Transport and Tariff Association Already from the fifties, the dynamic economic development and growing functional interdependence between Frankfurt and its region led to - still persisting- growth in intraregional transport (between 1960 and 1993 by more than 100 per cent). In order to handle this traffic, road construction was initially given `clear priority'; (44) however, in the course of the sixties it became increasingly evident that if the viability and efficiency of the central place and the region were to be ensured, it was necessary both markedly to improve public transport facilities and to coordinate and harmonize the various modes of transport and their administration at the regional level.
In mid-1973, after comprehensive preparations and on the basis of a contract under public-law concluded between the Federal Republic of Germany, the State of Hesse and the City of Frankfurt, the City of Frankfurt am Main - Municipal Utilities - and German Rail founded the Frankfurt Transport and Tariff Association (FVV) as a limited liability company. In May 1987, the Frankfurter-Königssteiner Eisenbahn AG became third shareholder in the company. The decision-making bodies of the FVV were the Council (with the City of Frankfurt, the State of Hesse, and the Federation as representatives), the general shareholders' meeting, standing committee, and a board of management, as well as an advisory board composed of leading public figures. (45)
The FVV started operations in May 1974, over a territory of 2200 kmē. coinciding more or less with the so-called Rhine-Main area (see section II.2). The system's transport network had developed in the course of history. In the following years it was therefore necessary to take comprehensive expansion and complementation measures to meet demand and operational requirements, especially in the underground and suburban railway systems (U-Bahn, S-Bahn), with the aim of establishing an integrated rapid transit system. In a 1992 study of the choice of modes of transport in the FVV area, a clear gap became evident: FVV services were used most often within the central city (public transport [more than 40 per cent] and passenger cars [50 per cent] were almost on a level), but were the least used mode of transport for journeys within the region (just under 12 per cent). |
|||||||||
|
2.1.2 |
The Regionalization of Public Transport With the aim of improving and optimizing German state railway services, and against the background of pertinent EC Commission requirements (especially the EC Regulation 1893/91), the German Bundestag adopted `a `fundamental railway structural reform consisting of a package of new statutes and amendments'. (46) An essential part of this reform is the regionalization of the public transport system. `The Federation as proprietor of state railways' relinquishes `responsibility for the public transport services offered by the Deutsche Bahn AG' (47), transferring these to the Länder under the `Regionalization Act'. The Länder were required to make the necessary detailed arrangements by the beginning of 1996.
In Hesse this had already been done by the end of 1993 with the adoption of the Act on the Further Development of Public Transport in Hesse. (48) The authorities given responsibility for the planning, organization, and implementation of mass transit are `the Landkreise, the county boroughs, and the Gemeinden with a population of 50,000 or more'. (49) For the purpose of performing the above-mentioned functions, these local authorities may set up integrated transport systems covering certain regions within Hesse. One such region is the Rhine-Main area.
In mid-1994, following comprehensive preparations and a differentiated feasibility study, the Rhine-Main Transport Association (Rhein-Main-Verkehrsverbund [RMV]) was founded, based largely on a concept of the UVF. In late May 1995 the RMV started operations - so to speak as a `large-scale experiment in railway transport regionalization', (50) thus taking up the succession to the 20-year-old FVV. |
|||||||||
|
2.2 |
The Functions and Organization of the RMV Covering an area of 14,000 kmē with a population of over 4 million, the RMV is the largest integrated transport system in Europe. It extends far beyond the limits of the Frankfurt Regional Union (UVF) and the FVV, including not only the Rhine-Main area but also large parts of central Hesse. The boundaries of the RMV were determined by, among other things, the terminal points of existing railway or bus routes.
Like the FVV, the RMV was given the legal status of a limited liability company (Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung -GmbH). But in contrast to the FVV, the RMV is an association of local authorities. The shareholders are not only the State of Hesse and the City of Frankfurt but also 10 county boroughs and 15 Landkreise. Because EC law requires the strict separation of `clients' (local authorities) and service providers (local transport undertakings), the latter are precluded from membership in the RMV.
The supreme decision-making body in the RMV is the shareholders' meeting; day-to-day business is entrusted to the management. A supervisory board has been established to make necessary short-term decisions and to ensure regular monitoring of management activities. Moreover, the creation of advisory boards is provided for `in the interests of the greatest possible cooperation with transportation experts, socially relevant groups, customers, and transport undertakings,' (51)and to advise the supervisory board and management.
Unlike the FVV, the RMV has a decentralized structure. Regionally important functions are at the management/administration level; the shareholders `continue to be responsible' `for their local services'. (52) A further structural principle is the separation of policy, management, and operations. Fundamental decisions are to be made and policy parameters set at the political level (Land and local authorities). The RMV, as the management level, is responsible for network and service planning, marketing and public relations, procurement of transport services, supervision of performance, as well as accounting and financing. The provision of local public transport services are the responsibility of (communal) transport undertakings (at present 115) on the basis of contracts with the RMV.
The principal objective of the RMV is the `intensified development of mass transit in the agglomerations and the region in order to provide the people living there with qualitatively and quantitatively adequate transportation services'. (53) The target is to raise the share of bus and rail services in total transportation in the system area from the present 16 per cent to 25 per cent. It is hoped to recoup at least 50 per cent of costs from income.
Whereas the fare system of the FVV was monocentrically oriented on the City of Frankfurt, the RMV with its different and greater territory operates with an area tariff system. The RMV motto is `One Timetable, One Tariff One Ticket'.
The planned range of services are to be financed by `fare and compensation revenue, transfer payments from the Federation and grants from the Länder and from local authorities'. () The Federal government continues to furnish the basic funding and facilities hitherto provided by German Rail; improvements in services with regard to transportation modes and traffic routes, on the other hand, have to be paid for proportionately by the local authorities and Kreise concerned. As an incentive for local `clients' to improve their mass transit services, the State of Hesse subsidizes Gemeinde and Kreis outlays in this field to the amount of 45 per cent. |
|
35 |
On these approaches see, int. al. Michael Borchmann, Der Umlandverband Frankfurt, in: Archiv für Kommunalwissenschaften I/1977, 24 ff. |
|
|
36 |
The Landrat in Hesse is the full-time salaried chief executive officer of a Landkreis. |
|
|
37 |
Dietrich Fürst et al., Regionalverbände im Vergleich. Entwicklungssteuerung in Verdichtungsräumen, Baden-Baden 1990, 37. |
|
|
38 |
Gesetz über den Umlandverband Frankfurt. |
|
|
39 |
Günter Seele, Verwaltungsorganisation in Großstadtregionen, in: Hinrich Lehmann-Grube, Günter Seele, Die Verwaltung der Verdichtungsräume, Baden-Baden 1983, 100. |
|
|
40 |
Ibid. |
|
|
41 |
Dietrich Fürst et al., l.c., 35. |
|
|
42 |
Ibid., and Gesetz über den Umlandverband Frankfurt of 11 September 1974, subsection 3(1). |
|
|
43 |
Dietrich Fürst et al., 39 |
|
|
44 |
Frankfurter Verkehrs- und Tarifverbund GmbH (eds.), FVV - Die ersten Schritte auf einem weiten Weg, Frankfurt&bsp;s.a., 4. |
|
|
45 |
Ibid., 4 f. |
|
|
46 |
Rhein-Main-Verkehrsverbund GmbH (eds.), Regionalisierung des Nahverkehrs, Modellprojekt Rhein-Main-Verkehrsverbund, RMV No. 3, Hofheim 1994, 5. |
|
|
47 |
Ibid., 11. |
|
|
48 |
Gesetz zur Weiterentwicklung des Öffentlichen Personennahverkehrs in Hessen (ÖPNV-Gesetz) vom 21. Dezember 1993. |
|
|
49 |
ÖPNV-Gesetz, subsection 3(1). |
|
|
50 |
Jochen Paulus, Netz kontra Auto, in: Die Zeit 23/1995, 27. |
|
|
51 |
Rhein-Main-Verkehrsverbund GmbH (eds.), l.c., 20. |
|
|
52 |
Volker Sparmann, Organisatorische und planerische Fragen der Umsetzung der Regionalisierung, manuscript, Hofheim 1993, 11. |
|
|
53 |
Rhein-Main-Verkehrsverbund (eds.), l.c. 15. |
|
|
54 |
Volker Sparmann, l.c., 18. |